Why do we need public television? Here's why:
The New Yorker
No. 23 West 43rd Street
New York, N.Y. 10036
September 26, 1966
Dear Steve:
I have a grandson now named Steven White, and I'll bet he can swim faster and stay under longer than you can.
As for television, I doubt that I have any ideas or suggestions that would be worth putting on paper. / Non-commercial TV should address itself to the ideal of excellence, not the idea of acceptability -- which is what keeps commercial TV from climbing the staircase. I think TV should be providing the visual counterpart of the literary essay, should arouse our dreams, satisfy our hunger for beauty, take us on journeys, enable us to participate in events, present great drama and music, explore the sea and the sky and the woods and the hills. It should be our Lyceum, our Chautauqua, our Minsky's, and our Camelot. It should restate and clarify the social dilemma and the political pickle. Once in a while it does, and you get a quick glimpse of its potential. /
As you see, I have nothing specific to offer and am well supplied with platitudes, every one of them gilt-edged. But thanks for the chance.
Yrs,
[signature] Andy White
E.B. White
[addressee]
Mr. Stephen White
Carnegie Commission on Educational Television
26 New Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts
http://www.current.org/pbpb/carnegie/EBWhiteLetter.html
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home